SEARCH 
 
A great gift for crisis deniers!
  
  
Humoring the Horror of the 
Converging Emergencies 
94 color pages 
$24.99 now $15! 
Or read FREE online! 
 
 
 
  Twitter 
 
  
 
Ping this story 
in social media: 
del.icio.us 
Digg 
Newsvine 
NowPublic 
Reddit 
Facebook 
StumbleUpon 
 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 
 | 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 
 | 
Chinese Climate Negotiator Provides Candid Take on What Happened in Copenhagen http://apocadocs.com/s.pl?1283093067 
First, by announcing programs and targets for the coming decade prior to the talks, the government continued to show the world that China is a responsible nation. Those plans were unconditional, as we do not believe that the future of mankind should be used as a bargaining chip - a position that contrasts sharply with the stance of developed nations.... They did not consider that their proposed 30 percent cuts have a long list of conditions attached, yet when we aim to cut carbon-intensity by 40 percent they say we are doing nothing.... The talks focused on two issues. One was long term goals. As disagreement over atmospheric carbon-dioxide concentrations and 2050 emissions targets was too great, these were not covered in the agreement, which specified only a goal of limiting any temperature increase to two degrees Celsius [above pre-industrial levels].... China is bound to be dependent on coal for energy - we cannot afford oil as an alternative when it costs more than US$100 dollars (680 yuan) a barrel.... Many problems can only be solved through development.
We cannot blindly accept that protecting the climate is humanity's common interest - national interests should come first.... The individual can save power, but there are 600 million people in India without electricity - the country has to develop and meet that need. And if that increases emissions, I say, "So what?" The people have a right to a better life.... Some EU nations have done well on emissions reductions, but the United States, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Spain and Italy have not just failed to make cuts – they have significantly increased their emissions. And they do not seem to feel they have done anything wrong.  
 | 
 | 
 
  | 
 | 
  | 
 
 
 |  
  | 
[Read more stories about: 
stupid humans, short-term thinking, coal issues] 
 | 
  | 
 
 
 
 | 
New!: 
 |  |  
 | 
No reader quips yet -- be the first!  |  |  
 | 
 Got a PaniQuip? 
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
We reserve the 
right to reuse, remove, or refuse any entry. 
 |  |  
 
 
 | 
  | 
'Doc Michael says:
 | 
  | 
 
  | 
  |  
| 
This is the way the world ends / not with a bang, but an economic justification.
 |  
| 
 |  
 
 | 
  | 
 
 
 
 
Want to explore more? 
Try the PaniCloud! 
 |