SEARCH
A great gift for crisis deniers!
Humoring the Horror of the
Converging Emergencies
94 color pages
$24.99 now $15!
Or read FREE online!
Twitter
Ping this story
in social media:
del.icio.us
Digg
Newsvine
NowPublic
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon Capture and Storage: To Be or Not To Be? Or, To Partially Be? http://apocadocs.com/s.pl?1238418009
One of the more contentious questions in the cleantech community is the role of coal in the energy sector of the future. There's a lot of coal in the world -- many decades of supply left -- including here in the U.S. It's pretty darned cheap to mine. So, it would be great to figure out a way to use it in non-harmful ways. And there's the rub: it's a pretty nasty fuel. Putting aside the issue of how to mine coal in an environmentally-acceptable manner, coal is one of the most highly carbonaceous of hydrocarbons, meaning that it generates a lot of carbon dioxide per unit of energy released when burned -- much more so than oil or natural gas. As a result, the worldwide use of coal -- primarily for power generation -- is the largest component of global carbon dioxide emissions, which in turn is the most important of the greenhouse gas emissions contributing to climate change.
In the arena of climate change, coal is therefore the main culprit. Not the only culprit, to be sure, but the main one....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Read more stories about:
carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, coal issues]
|
|
|
New!:
| |
|
Your Quips: Phillip says: "Coal should die a dirty, toxic, heavy-metal-laden death. Fast."
| |
|
Got a PaniQuip?
|
|
|
We reserve the
right to reuse, remove, or refuse any entry.
| |
|
|
'Doc Jim says:
|
|
|
|
Hey, it all smells like the same air to me.
|
|
|
|
Want to explore more?
Try the PaniCloud!
|