SEARCH
A great gift for crisis deniers!
Humoring the Horror of the
Converging Emergencies
94 color pages
$24.99 now $15!
Or read FREE online!
Twitter
Ping this story
in social media:
del.icio.us
Digg
Newsvine
NowPublic
Reddit
Facebook
StumbleUpon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First nations join pool of Fisheries petitioners http://apocadocs.com/s.pl?1214318969
"The government has often used economics to rationalize wiping out or eradicating a particular species, or wiping out habitat for a species. They rationalize it with this thing called 'no net loss'," he said.
"In other words they are arrogant enough to think that man is able and capable of making a decision on wiping out habitat, God's creation, and replacing it with some man-made habitat. And I don't think it's possible.
"That's one of the policies I'd like the Auditor-General to look at, that goofy policy called 'no net loss'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Read more stories about:
sixth extinction, pesticide runoff]
This item will appear in our PANIQuiz!
|
|
|
New!:
| |
|
No reader quips yet -- be the first! | |
|
Got a PaniQuip?
|
|
|
We reserve the
right to reuse, remove, or refuse any entry.
| |
|
|
The ApocaDocs say:
|
|
|
|
Goofy indeed: 'no net loss' of microbes? 'no net loss' of fungi? 'no net loss' of insects?
|
|
|
|
Want to explore more?
Try the PaniCloud!
|